Legal Opinion
American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 10, 2010No. Civil Action 2:08cv547PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judg ment of noninfringement and invalidity of the 5,355,964 Patent (the “'964 Patent”) and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment of infringement. For the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS the defendant’s motion, in part, and DENIES the plaintiffs motion. As the court finds a hearing unnecessary, the court DENIES the parties’ request for a hearing.
I. Background
The '964 Patent was issued to John White on October 18, 1994, who then assigned it to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Phonometrics, Inc. v. Northern Telecom Inc., and United Telephone Company of Florida, and Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Coconut Grove Pads, Inc. v. Mich & Mich TGR, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- ULTIMATE HOME PROTECTOR PANS, INC. v. CAMCO MANUFACTURING, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020