Legal Opinion
American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 21, 2011No. 2010-1283, 2010-1314PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
This consolidated appeal concerns claim construction and infringement issues common to seven separate lawsuits filed by American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. (“American Piledriving”) in different district courts across the United States. In each suit, American Piledriving claims that the defendants — a manufacturer of construction equipment and its distributors— have either made or sold certain pile driving devices that infringe United States Patent No. 5,355,964 (“the '964 Patent”). Whether the accused devices infringe the '964 Patent largely turns in each action on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Investpic LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- 523 IP LLC v. CureMD.ComDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.