Legal Opinion
Campbell v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 28, 1986No. 83 C 3884PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
This antitrust case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, cab drivers in the City of Chicago, have brought this action against defendants, the City of Chicago (“City”), Yellow Cab Company (“Yellow”), and Checker Taxi Company, Inc. (“Checker”) claiming violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The action is brought by several individual plaintiffs and on behalf of a class consisting of all persons who have held Public Vehicle Chauffeur’s Licenses issued by the City and who have leased or subleased taxicabs…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Westfield Partners, Ltd. v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Campbell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Eichenseer v. Madison-Dane County Tavern League, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Campbell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Avalon Carriage Service Inc. v. City of St. AugustineDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.