Legal Opinion
Haugen v. Total Petroleum, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 1, 1992No. Civ. 4-91-21PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on remand from the Eighth Circuit, 960 F.2d 762 (1992), for reconsideration of an order dismissing plaintiff’s claims as untimely. Based on a review of the file and record, the court reaffirms its prior dismissal.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brought the present action alleging that defendant refused to hire him because of his disability, in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. § 363.01, subd. 13. It is undisputed that plaintiff’s cause of action accrued on July 1, 1988, the date of defendant’s refusal. On June 21,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Aardvark Associates, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aardvark Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marty H. Segelbaum, Inc. v. MW CAPITAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- James L. Haugen v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992