Legal Opinion
Peabody Holding Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2012No. 19-1341PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge WYNN joined.
OPINION
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
Appellee United Mine Workers of America, International Union (“Union”) entered into a limited job-preference agreement with Peabody Coal Company (“Peabody Coal”). The agreement, which included an arbitration clause, also bound Peabody Coal’s parent company and the parent company’s subsidiaries. Positing that the parent company — Peabody Holding Company, LLC (“Peabody Holding”) — and a subsidiary — Black Beauty Coal Company (“Black Beauty”) — had shirked their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Belnap v. Iasis HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- William Jones v. Waffle House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Cynthia Huffman v. The Hilltop CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- James Hayes v. Delbert Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Simply Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.