In Re Grand Jury Investigation of the Shipping Industry
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
LEONARD P. WALSH, District Judge.
The Deputy Attorney General on November 24, 1959, authorized and directed that evidence of possible indictable criminal offenses which may have been committed in the ocean shipping industry be presented to a grand jury in the District of Columbia, The letter of the Deputy Attorney General reads in part as follows:
“The Department is informed that violations of the federal antitrust laws, the Shipping Act of 1916, and other federal statutes may have occurred and may still be occurring in connection with the activities and conduct of certain persons, firms,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co., A.G. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., a Swiss Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum, Etc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.