Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Garage

United States District Court

Decided July 5, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, D. C. J.

The essential facts involved are not disputed. The garage keeper furnished services and supplies to the automobile of the plaintiff in replevin. He released the car from his control although the bill was unpaid. Subsequently, the garage keeper acting through a bailiff, seized the car and took it into his possession and claims a lien on the car under the Garage Keepers’ Lien act, R. 8. 1937, 2:60-21, 2:60-22. The plaintiff in replevin demanded a statement of the amount claimed and a statement was furnished claiming $9.14 for services and an additional charge of $10 for fees and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ThyfaultNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Onondaga Truck Lease Inc. v. HovellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Windsor Contr. Corp. v. BudnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API