Legal Opinion

Ferris v. Blumhardt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1956No. 33045Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 Wn.2d 395 (1956)

293 P.2d 935

THOMAS J. FERRIS et al., Appellants,

v.

DAN BLUMHARDT, as Executor, et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants.[1]

No. 33045.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 23, 1956.

OTT, J.

In their first cause of action, Thomas J. Ferris and Evelyn B. Ferris, husband and wife, sought (1) specific performance against the estate of Anna C. Witzig of a contract to make a will in their favor, and (2) restoration to the estate of a gift of five thousand dollars made by Mrs. Witzig in her lifetime to Dan and Bernice M. Blumhardt, husband and wife. In the alternative, by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bruce v. MoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. Skinner v. RascheCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Losli v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1950

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API