Groom v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., USA
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Court has under consideration the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment to which the Plaintiffs have responded. The Motion has been fully briefed and oral arguments have been received by the Court.
Plaintiffs filed an application with the Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Commission (Commission) to revoke or suspend the license of the Defendant to do business in Oklahoma as a manufacturer of motor vehicles pursuant to 47 O.S.A. § 565(j) (4). 1 After a hearing the Commission denied the application. Plaintiffs did not pursue the appeal therefrom provided by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Painters District Council No. 38, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. Edgewood Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- McKee v. Producers & Refiners Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wilkey v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gear v. City of Des MoinesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
- Nelson v. Oklahoma State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Whiteis v. Yamaha International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.