Legal Opinion
Whiteis v. Yamaha International Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1976No. Nos. 75-1036 and 75-1037PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This action was commenced by appellee, Harold G. Whiteis, to recover damages resulting from the cancellation of his franchises to sell Yamaha motorcycles. After a trial to the court, judgment was entered against appellant, Yamaha International Corporation, in the amount of $100,000. The trial court found Yamaha acted in bad faith in violation of its obligations under the franchise contracts and under Okl.Stat. Ann. tit. 47, § 561 et seq. (Supp.1975-76).1 Yamaha has appealed the judgment against it and Whiteis has cross-appealed from the denial of attorney’s fees and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Southwest Ice & Dairy Products v. FaulkenberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Moral Insurance Company v. CookseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Hunt v. Washington Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frankie J. King and Beverly J. King, and Cross-Appellants v. Horizon Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Harold G. Whiteis, a Sole Proprietor, D/B/A Motor Sports of Tulsa v. Yamaha International Corporation, a Corporation, Harold G. Whiteis, a Sole Proprietor, D/B/A Motor Sports of Tulsa, Cross-Appellant v. Yamaha International Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976