State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This is an appeal growing out of the failure of the Nebraska State Bank, of Humboldt, Nebraska. It may be said that the controlling facts are not in dispute and may be epitomized as follows: The Vickers Petroleum Company, doing business at Wichita, Kansas, in consideration of merchandise furnished, received on the 12th day of April, 1929, a check of $610.70 drawn by its debtor, the Star Oil Company of Humboldt, Nebraska, on the Nebraska State Bank of Humboldt (herein designated as Humboldt bank), wherein it is conceded the drawer was a depositor and had ample credit to cover the check. In due…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bank of Poplar Bluff v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Holder v. Western German BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Henefin v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Placek v. EdstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Willan v. FarrarNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Runner v. PiersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Dodge Motor Trucks, Inc. v. First National Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.