Legal Opinion
Holder v. Western German Bank
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1905No. 1,343PublishedCited by 21 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERFNS, Circuit Judge.
This was an action prosecuted by the plaintiff in error to recover from the Western German Bank the sum of $4,000, being the amount of a check deposited with it for collection, and interest from March 13, 1903. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The following statement of the material facts as found by the court, and, as we think, fairly exhibited in the brief for plaintiff in error, is sufficient for the purposes of our decision:
“On the 10th day of March, 1903, the plaintiff, being the holder of a cheek for $4,000, drawn upon the Commercial Bank of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
3Cited by21 opinions
- Macy v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Smith v. Township of Au GresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Smith v. MottleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Ellerbe v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Leach v. Battle Creek Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.