Legal Opinion
William Hudson and Bishop Pamon v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 13, 2004No. 03-2690PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs William Hudson and Bishop Pamon, former police officers with the Chicago Police Department, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago. Hudson and Pamon claim that when the Department terminated their employment pursuant to an “absent without permission” (“AWOP”) policy, the City (through the Department) failed to provide them with due process of law. The district court granted summary judgment to the City, and we affirm.
I. History
As officers in the police department whose “appointment[s] ha[d] become complete,” Hudson and Pamon could only…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Frank Buttitta v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Eric Kuhn v. Washtenaw CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Khan v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of WestfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Casna v. City of Loves ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Palka v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.