Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Nielson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

On April 3, 1973, we filed our original opinion in this case issued without oral argument. We subsequently vacated our opinion on April 19, 1973, when it was disclosed that the appellees had served their answering brief on the lawyers representing Arizona Title & Trust Company instead of the attorneys for appellants. We then permitted the appellants to file their reply brief and granted oral argument to the parties. Our opinion follows.

Capitol Investment Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Capitol) entered into an agreement with Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dittman v. NagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Vilord v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Park Central Development Co. v. Roberts Dry Goods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Nielson v. Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Sato v. First National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sikora v. VanderploegCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Clearwater Minerals Corp. v. PresnellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hoover v. NielsonArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bank of the West v. Estate of LeoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API