Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Nielson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1974No. 11281-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

This matter comes before us on petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 20 Ariz.App. 130, 510 P.2d 760 (filed April 3, 1973), affirming the judgment of the Superior Court which ordered rescission of a land exchange agreement between appellant and appellee.

We are asked to consider four questions: 1) Was there a breach of warranty by the appellants Hoover? 2) Was the remedy of rescission available to appellees Nielson? 3) Were the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the trial court supported by the evidence? 4) Did the trial court err in denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dittman v. NagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Vilord v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Kresse v. RyersonArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Nielson v. Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Hoover v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Clearwater Minerals Corp. v. PresnellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lyons v. PhilippartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API