Legal Opinion

Hocking v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 14, 1962No. 38,301PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This appeal involves an action for personal injuries sustained by Steven Michael Hocking, a minor, brought against the Duluth, Mis-sabe & Iron Range Railway Company in said minor’s behalf by his mother and natural guardian, and said action includes a separate claim by Corinne Hocking, the mother, for medical, hospital, and other expenses incurred by her. The injuries to said minor resulted from a fall while climbing about a trestle leading to one of the ore docks of defendant railway company in the city of Duluth.

The case was tried to a jury. At the close of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. McHugh Et Ux. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Choate v. Indiana Harbor Belt R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hanson v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Alston v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  4. Hughes v. Quarve & Anderson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API