State v. Baynard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error the form of the indictments in these cases, alleging that they were insufficient to charge the crimes of obtaining and attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud and forgery. The indictments read, in essential part, as follows: “that . . . defendant . . . unlawfully, willfully and feloniously did intentionally acquire (and attempt to acquire) a controlled substance ... by misrepresentation, fraud, deception and subterfuge in that [she] presented a prescription which was . . . a false or forged prescription.” Defendant contends this in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. FronebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. JoseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.