Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hackenberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

We granted allowance of appeal in order to determine whether it is permissible to apply the deadly weapon enhancement provision1 of the Sentencing Guidelines2 to a conviction for cruelty to animals.3 For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

*199On March 23, 2000, at approximately noon, Mike Meiser let Chief, his two year-old yellow Labrador retriever, out of his home in Thompsonville. Although the dog usually stayed close to the Meisers’ home when it was let out, it strayed from the property on this day, as three Pennsylvania Power & Light (“PP&L”)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HackenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. ClarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. KnellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Smith, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API