Legal Opinion

Lara v. County of Yolo ex rel. Constancio

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1988No. 18357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court, entered pursuant to the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA), NRS 130.010 et seq. The order requires the appellant to pay continuing child support. For the reasons expressed in this opinion, we affirm the order of the district court.

Monica Cruz Constancio, appellant’s daughter, was born on August 9, 1975. Monica’s mother did not inform Lara of the child’s birth. Monica began receiving welfare benefits in 1982; subsequently, the Welfare Department filed a complaint in Yolo County, California, seeking…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. VineNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnson v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. HudsonNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vix v. State of Wis. Ex Rel. VixNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Taylor v. VilcheckNevada Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Department of Health & Human Resources Ex Rel. Cline v. PentasugliaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Smith v. County of San DiegoNevada Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API