Smith v. County of San Diego
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court entered pursuant to the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA), NRS 130.010-.370.
Respondent San Diego County filed a RURESA action against *303appellant Edgar Smith. Because Smith lives in Nevada, the case was transferred to Las Vegas for enforcement. San Diego County requested an order requiring Smith to pay child support for his child. The county also alleged that it was entitled to reimbursement from Smith for the amounts it had advanced to support Smith’s child. Smith’s child had been placed in…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Luckett v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. HudsonNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Lara v. County of Yolo ex rel. ConstancioNevada Supreme Court · 1988
4Cited by2 opinions
- Polk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re: K.M.S.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022