Legal Opinion
Rozek v. Ampro Computers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 4, 2014No. Case No. 3:-13CV2655PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is an employment-discrimination case.
Plaintiff Jerome Rozek alleges his former employer, Ampro Computers, fired him because of his age. He brings claims against Ampro and its Vice President, Elizabeth Campbell, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Ohio’s anti-discrimination statutes, and Ohio common law. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1332(a)(1), and 1367(a).
Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss all but Rozek’s ADEA claim. (Doc. 10). For the following reasons, I grant the motion.
Backgro…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Kevin W. Ziegler v. Ibp Hog Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Elek v. Huntington National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020