Legal Opinion

Hendriks v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1994No. 18432PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Doug Hendriks (Hendriks), sought a liquor license from the Canton City Commission (Commission). The Commission refused his request and Hendriks then petitioned the circuit court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Commission to issue the license to him. Following a trial on the merits of Hendriks’ petition the trial court entered an order denying Hendriks’ petition. Hendriks appeals. We affirm the trial court.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

After a fire in 1992 destroyed eight businesses in Canton, South Dakota, the Commission held public hearings to review applications…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rykhus v. RykhusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tri County Landfill Ass'n v. Brule CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Black Hills Central Railroad v. City of Hill CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API