Legal Opinion
General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-1717PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GESELL, District Judge.
General Railway Signal Co. (“GRS”) and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) entered into a lump-sum contract covering three phases of the Metro subway project. This is a dispute over the proper amount to be deducted as an equitable adjustment for a change of work eliminating a specific portion of the work covered by the contract. By cross-motions for summary judgment, which have been fully argued, the Court is asked to review the final decision of WMATA’s general manager adopting the majority opinion and rejecting the minority decision of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Victory Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Nager Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- S. N. Nielsen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988