Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Jantz

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1984No. D001497PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

The People appeal the granting of Bryan Jantz’s petition for writ of habeas corpus striking the parole term imposed by the Board of Prison Terms (Board). Jantz contended he was entitled to be released from custody with no parole conditions pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 1170, subdivision (a)(2) because his presentence custody credits exceeded the length of the felony sentence imposed. The superior court did not decide whether section 1170, subdivision (a)(2) prohibits imposing a parole period on a prisoner whose prison confinement has been satisfied by presentence credits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Charles A. Johnson v. J. Williford, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center United States Parole Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ChewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. Steward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. In Re WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API