Legal Opinion

People v. London

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1988No. H003572PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

A jury convicted defendant Kent L. London of one count of receiving stolen property and three counts of conspiracy to commit forgery. Because his preimprisonment credit exceeded the 16-month sentence, the court released him from custody and ordered him to report to his parole officer.

London contends on appeal that the court erred in instructing the jury and in limiting closing argument. He also contends that he was entitled to be released without any parole obligation. Finding no error in the trial or the sentence, we affirm.

I. Facts

The People charged London by information…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. PonceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. Steward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API