Graham v. Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Ariz. Div.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
The issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice and in refusing to grant plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s original complaint sought to recover from defendant Goodyear Aerospace Corporation certain pension benefits which plaintiff claimed were due by reason of a contract between his union and the defendant.
Prior to the filing of any answer to plaintiff’s complaint, defendant filed a motion to dismiss, asserting primarily that the complaint failed to state a claim by reason…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rogers v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. TitsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Waltner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- In Re $70,070 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Graham v. Goodyear Aerospace Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978