Legal Opinion

Soczka v. Rechner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1976No. 615 (1974)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The judgments appealed from, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs against each of the defendants, are based on a jury verdict finding the plaintiff Alois Soczka, Jr., 45 percent negligent and defendants Jacob Reehner and Irvin Huebsch 30 percent and 25 percent negligent, respectively, in an accident in which Soczka’s ear collided with a tractor being driven by the defendant Huebsch. The questions on appeal are (1) Should Huebsch’s negligence be imputed to Reehner on the theory that Huebsch was Rechner’s agent? (2) Should the plaintiff here be allowed to recover under sec. 895,045,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wipfli v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Mariuzza v. KenowerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. D. R. W. Corporation v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lupie v. HartzheimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Reiter v. DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. RidenourWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Odenwalt v. ZaringIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API