Legal Opinion

Smith v. Menominee Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

On February 7, 1883, one Canterbury brought suit in the circuit court for the county of Menominee against one McClintock, and garnished the relators as having in their hands property of McClintock. Judgment was recovered in the principal suit, and the garnishees disclosed that they were in possession of certain goods and chatteís of the estimated value of $6000, as mortgagees of McClintock, under a mortgage given to secure the payment of $4775, all of which was due and unpaid. The garnishment suit appears to have been brought to trial before a jury, who returned a verdict that the garnishees…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worthington v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Haynes v. LeppigMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. King v. HubbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Cary v. HewittMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Nelson v. FerrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Band v. Livonia AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API