Nelson v. Ferris

Plaintiff sued defendants in trespass for levying upon certain personal property in his possession, and which he claimed to own. The levy was under a judgment against *498Otto S. Hill and James M. Ferris, in favor of defendant Levi.

As the only error set up in the record is the judge’s conclusion of law from the facts found, we are only required to consider whether the facts found support the judgment. If they do so, it is not very important to inquire whether the conclusions of law apart from the judgment are correct or not. Hnless plaintiff has been injured by the judgment it will not- be…