Legal Opinion

People v. Shoemaker

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1982No. Crim. 11536PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

We here consider whether defense evidence of a victim’s subsequent acts of violence is admissible in a criminal case to prove his aggressive and violent character at the time of the earlier crime. We conclude that this post crime character evidence is relevant and, like all relevant evidence, is admissible unless properly excluded under Evidence Code section 352.

A jury convicted defendant of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)), and found he inflicted great bodily injury in the commission of that crime. (Pen. Code, § 12022.7.) He admitted a prior…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. ArcherdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Moore v. American United Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. DunsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API