Legal Opinion

Gustin v. Nevada-Pacific Development Corp.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 24, 1954No. 936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff Harley J. Gustin to quiet title to certain lode mining claims situated in Nye County, State of Nevada, known as Kay Cooper Nos. 1 to 11 inclusive. The defendants by counterclaim seek to quiet title to lode mining claims known as Ray Ricketts Nos. 1 to 4, both inclusive.

At the beginning of the trial the following colloquy occurred:

“The Court: Was there something here in the nature of an accounting agreement?
“Mr. Ross: [For defendants] There is a supplmentary proceeding and your Honor will recall that we had a hearing in court, in which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butte City Water Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Overman Silver Mining Co. v. CorcoranNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Swanson v. SearsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Ford v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lombardo Turquoise Milling & Mining Co., Inc. v. HemanesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1977
  2. Claybaugh v. GancarzNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Barton v. DeRousseNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Nevada-pacific Development Corp. v. GustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Claybaugh v. GancarzNevada Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API