Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. Easton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1990No. CA 11670PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRADY, J.,

In this appeal we are asked to reverse the trial court's decision granting summary judgment for Progressive. The issue before us is whether the trial court erred in finding the language in a motorcycle insurance policy issued by Progressive to Robert A. Easton excluded from coverage claims for injuries to Easton's wife while she was a passenger because she was a "covered person" under the policy. Easton argues that the policy is ambiguous because it does not clarify whether a "covered person," excluded from personal injury coverage, could nevertheless recover under a Guest Passenger…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kaplysh v. TakieddineOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hillyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Casto v. Sanders, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Burgess v. Erie Ins. Group, Unpublished Decision (3-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Towne v. Progressive Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Kleyman v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2008 Ap 05 0032 (12-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API