Legal Opinion
John Joseph Mull v. Edwin Ackerman, Defendant-Respondent, Colt Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 2, 1960No. 26095_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought this action in the Southern District of New York to recover damages of $500,000 alleged to have been sustained as a result of having been struck by a taxicab in New York City. The complaint named as defendants Colt Co., Inc., the owner of the cab, Fermaglick, its driver, Ackerman and others who were alleged to dominate Colt Co., Inc. so as to make them liable for its actions, two companies alleged to have failed to maintain the cab properly, the company that manufactured the cab and the dealer that sold it. Federal jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship. Ackerman…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lopinsky v. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Feliciano Ruiz v. Alfonso Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
- Walkovszky v. CarltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Barnett W. Woodby v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation, and Third-Party v. Edward Laverne Burghardt, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Selmes Paul Funkhouser v. City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, And/or the Port of New York Authority, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.