Legal Opinion
Commer v. McEntee
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 24, 2003No. 00 Civ. 7913(RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Gerald McEntee, John Sefe-rian and Ralph Pepe have moved under Rule 12(b)(5) for dismissal of the complaint against them for failure to effect service upon them. Defendants Uma Kutwal, Michelle Keller and Robert Mariano have moved for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the LMRDA § 101(a)(2) claim against them for lack of LMRDA jurisdiction over them for conduct occurring after December 13, 1999. Kutwal, Keller and Mariano also move for summary judgment under Rule 56, arguing that the LMRDA § 101(a)(2) claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
For…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sikhs for Justice v. NathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Weston Funding, LLC v. Consorcio G Grupo Dina, S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rodriguez v. HaynesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Caleb and Brown Pty. Ltd. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Holliman v. ASA College, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.