Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Haynes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 28, 2004No. 04 CIV. 2950(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Eunice Rodriguez and Nicholas Mancuso, members of the Executive Board of City Employees Union Local 237, are suing Local 237, its current president Carl Haynes and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”), for interfering with plaintiffs’ joint campaign for union office and for misappropriating Local 237’s resources to assist Haynes in his re-election campaign.. Each .plaintiff, alleges five causes of action against the defendants: (a) subjecting plaintiffs to unequal treatment in violation of the Labor Management Reporting…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stechler v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Molina v. Union Independiente Autentica De La AAADistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  3. Blythe v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Medford v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  5. Evans III v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API