Legal Opinion
Sikhs for Justice v. Nath
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 2012No. 10 Civ. 2940PublishedCited by 297 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are several motions and a cross-motion filed by the parties to this action.
The plaintiffs Sikhs for Justice and seven individuals (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) moved pursuant to Rules 54(a), 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce*603dure and Local Rule 6.3 for reconsideration or reargument of the opinion of this Court (“Motion to Reconsider”), entered on March 7, 2012, which dismissed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) as to defendant Kamal Nath (“Nath”) without prejudice.
The Plaintiffs also moved for default judgment…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by297 opinions
- Ellul v. Congregation of Christian Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Vaher v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Minnie Rose LLC v. YuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Lowinger v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Medcalf v. Thompson Hine LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.