Legal Opinion

Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1965No. 37581PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, J. †

Plaintiffs Guy F. Atkinson Company, a corporation, and Ostrander Construction Company, a corporation, were joint venturers doing business under the assumed name of “Atkinson-Ostrander Co.” The sole activity of the joint venture was the construction of The Dalles Dam, a $150,000,000 project on the Columbia River between the states of Washington and Oregon.

September 1, 1954, the Tax Commission of the State of Washington commenced an examination of the books and records of the joint venturers, referred to as plaintiffs herein. This examination was completed on January 14, 1958, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rushlight v. MacLainWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wickwire v. ReardWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rochester v. TulpWashington Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Honeywell, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wood v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Tipton v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API