Legal Opinion

Rochester v. Tulp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1959No. 34815PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to reopen the case for further evidence.

Mrs. Mable Maye Kimball died on September 25, 1953, in California. At the time of her death the defendants, Edward and Karol Tulp, were staying at her home in Los Angeles. Mrs. Amelia Norris, the other defendant, is Mrs. Tulp’s mother and a sister-in-law of the deceased. Mrs. Norris joined the Tulps in Los Angeles shortly after Mrs. Kimball’s death.

The plaintiff, Hazel Rochester, is the deceased’s daughter and executrix of her estate. She brought this action in the superior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wickwire v. ReardWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Zulauf v. CartonWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In RE ESTES v. HoppWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re the Estate of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tsubota v. George GunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City of Seattle v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API