Legal Opinion

Hoppendietzel v. Wade

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1941No. 29151PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The question of the sufficiency of the petition against the general demurrer must be determined apart from any consideration of whether or not the landlord would be liable under the facts alleged. An agent is personally liable to one injured by his misfeasance or act of negligence, but ordinarily is not liable for mere nonfeasance. Reid v. Humber, 49 Ga. 207; Kimbrough v. Boswell, 119 Ga. 201 (45 S. E. 977). He may, however, become liable where, though originally not bound to act at all, he enters upon the execution of a particular work and so negligently performs it as to cause injury to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Kimbrough v. BoswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Reid v. HumberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Risby v. Sharp-Boylston CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Howell v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Sharp-Boylston Co. v. BostickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Lee v. Huiet & Powell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API