Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The appellant Mrs. Herring appealed from the judgments rendered in favor of three defendants (the Church, Mathis and Mrs. Bourn). The appeal contained some 26 paragraphs specifically listing items to be omitted. In summary of these specified omissions, the notice of appeal recited: “Omit the entire record except the petition, the amendment to the complaint, the renewed motions to dismiss by R. Lloyd *136Mathis, II, Grant Park Baptist Church, and Mrs. Willeen Bourn, respectively, and plaintiff’s affidavit of her inability to pay costs.” Thus, although the three judgments which were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Roberts v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Laseter v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bourn v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Samuel v. BaitcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Candler General Hospital, Inc. v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Herrington v. Stone Mountain Memorial Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.