Legal Opinion · Dissent
Avondale Mills v. Saddler
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 7, 1974No. SC 413Published
1DissentHeflin, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent for the reasons set out hereinafter.
Pertinent portions of the trial court’s finding of facts and final decree are set out immediately hereinafter.
“This is a class action presenting a justiciable controversy, properly brought in equity.
The named complainants were employed, for varying periods of time, by Avondale Mills at its Birmingham, Alabama Plant. Their employment ended on or about September IS, 1971, when the company ordered the Plant permanently closed. Each complainant was ready, willing and able to continue his or her employment beyond that date, and had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- Frank P. Schneider, and Cross-Appellants v. The Electric Auto-Lite Company, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Lovelace v. Marion InstituteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Livestock Feeds, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1634 of Congress of Ind. WorkersMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Haag v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.