Haag v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Berrien superior court — Judge Merrill. September 28, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
1. In June, 1909, Haag, the proprietor of a circus, as party of the first part, and Rogers, as party of the second part, made the following contract: “The said party of the second part hereby agrees to render services as workingman for the season commencing on or about July 20, and to continue for the show seasoii, or so long as mutually agreeable to both parties, under the following conditions: 1st. Party of the second part agrees to render services to Haag’s Mighty Shows, in a painstaking manner, and to be responsible for all property damaged by careless driving or willful carelessness of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Finlay v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Milledgeville Cotton Co. v. CaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by24 opinions
- Die & Mold, Inc. v. WesternIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Public Finance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Livestock Feeds, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1634 of Congress of Ind. WorkersMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Coleman v. Graybar Electric Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Thompson v. BurrOregon Supreme Court · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.