Michael v. Greene
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The first question raised by this appeal is whether the rights of plaintiff are governed by the law of North. Carolina or the law of Texas. The evidence indicates that the relationship between the parties was created and is centered in Texas. The discussions between the parties concerning the possibility of plaintiffs entry into the jewelry business took place in Texas. The alleged misrepresentations which are the basis for the plaintiffs fraud action were made by Greene while in Texas. Plaintiff decided to go into the jewelry business and placed his first order with defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. JonesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Moore & Moore Drilling Company v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Lowe's North Wilkesboro Hardware, Inc. v. The Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Santana, Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Virginia Bank v. Air-Lift Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- American Rockwool, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Andrew Jackson Sales v. Bi-Lo Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.