Andrew Jackson Sales v. Bi-Lo Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns error to the court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant, contending that the “pleadings, affidavits and depositions presented to the Superior Court . . . present a genuine issue of material fact for determination by a jury.” Before examining the merits of plaintiffs claim, we must determine what law governs the substantive aspects of this case.
The traditional choice of law rule employed by our courts in deciding actions in tort is lex loci delicti, determined in turn by the place where the injury occurs. Petrea v. Tank Lines, 264 N.C. 230, 141 S.E. 2d 278…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petrea v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- United States Retail Credit Association, Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Santana, Inc., Successor to Soft-Fade Apparel Processors, Inc., T/d/b/a Soft-Fab Textile Processors v. Levi Strauss and Company, Santana, Inc., Successor to Soft-Fade Apparel Processors, Inc.,t/d/b/a Soft-Fab Textile Processors v. Levi Strauss and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Michael v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by33 opinions
- United Virginia Bank v. Air-Lift Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- The IN PORTERS, SA v. Hanes Printables, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- American Rockwool, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- In Re Epic Mortgage Insurance LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.