Legal Opinion

Daly v. Pennie

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1890No. 13805PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

— The defendants had final judgment upon demurrer to the second amended complaint, and the plaintiffs appeal. The material facts shown by the pleading are as follows: —

Anna J. Skerrett died in London, England, being a *553resident of said place at the time of her death, and leaving a will. This will was proved in an English court, and an administrator with the will annexed appointed there. A duly authenticated copy was filed in the prohate court of San Francisco, and the defendant Pennie was appointed administrator with the will annexed here. In due course, the San Francisco court made a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Barnett v. KilbourneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API