Legal Opinion

Pippin v. Barker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1951No. 166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Decision here turns on whether the discretionary power of sale vested in D. Sams expired at his death, or survived and was transmitted to his executors. If the power expired, plaintiff’s title is good and she prevails; if the power survives, her title is thereby encumbered and she may not prevail. The court below ruled with the plaintiff,- — that the power expired, — and we approve.

The controlling principle is stated in 41 Am. Jur., Powers, Sec. 31, p. 826: “It may be said to be the general rule that where a power is coupled with a personal confidence or discretion the donee cannot delegate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Patrick v. . BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Young v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Akin v. First National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Henderson v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butt v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. First Trust Co. v. CochraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API