Legal Opinion

Patrick v. . Beatty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1932PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The controversy between the parties originates in their diverse constructions of the second and seventh items of the will. The plaintiff says that upon the death of the devisor, the trustee, Yennie Beatty, acquired the title and the right of possession to a one-third undivided interest in the devised real property for the benefit of Paul 0. Beatty; that Paul C. Beatty is the equitable owner; and that the plaintiff has succeeded to his title as his trustee in bankruptcy. Yennie Beatty takes substantially the same positioii but insists that the right of division and possession must await the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  2. Page v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Watson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davis v. NC Granite CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Fisher v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API