Legal Opinion
Zobel v. DALE BELLAMAH LAND COMPANY
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1967No. 8433PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant brought suit to recover $6,527.92 claimed to be due from defendant for the year ending December 15, 1965 on account of a written option agreement.
The contract was dated December 15, 1964 and was between plaintiff and certain trustees on the one hand, and defendant on the other. By the terms of the agreement, plaintiff and the trustees agreed to sell, and defendant to purchase, a piece of property described as Tract A and plaintiff granted defendant an option on property described as Tract B.
Article I contains “Miscellaneous” provisions applicable to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Harp v. GourleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Woodson v. LeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Knoebel v. Chief Pontiac, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Hofmann v. McCanliesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Stephenson v. Dale Bellamah Land Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Margaret Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983