Legal Opinion

Hofmann v. McCanlies

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1966No. 7862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENSLEY, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Thereafter, by leave granted, the plaintiff filed his first amended complaint, and in due time it met the same fate. The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from an order dismissing his first amended complaint.

The relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant was that of landlord and tenant. The plaintiff, by written instrument, leased certain office space to the defendant for a term of twelve months, with a so-called “option” to renew, expressed in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque v. TanneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. University Realty & Development Co. v. Omid-Gaf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Economy Rentals, Inc. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zobel v. DALE BELLAMAH LAND COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API