In re the Marriage of Neal
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Wife appeals from a trial court order that determined that her one-third share of husband’s pension is based on the pension distribution formula applicable at the time of the parties’ dissolution rather than on the formula applicable at the time that husband began to receive his pension benefits. She contends that her share should be based on the later rather than on the earlier distribution formula. We agree with wife and reverse.
The facts are undisputed. The parties were married in June 1972. Shortly thereafter, husband was drafted by the Portland Trail Blazers of the National Basketball…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Bennett v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Gourley v. ToweryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- In re BlomquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Marriage of CarrollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Perma Treat, Inc. v. Toma Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- In re HurtleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Casebeer v. Krocker (In re Estate of Casebeer)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.